傲慢与偏见读书心得英文版（通用3篇）
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters.
The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
早就听说这是本极好的书，一日，偶得此书，即迫不及待地翻下去了。如果说开始是抱着猎奇的态度来看此书的话，那么到了后来，便是迫不及待地想翻下去了。
这本书主要是通过贝内特一家几个女儿的婚姻描写，反映了几种不同的婚姻观念。在爱情中，究竟是应该把美貌、金钱、地位还是爱情本身放在第一位呢?作者并没有死板地采用说理的方法来阐明自己的观点，而是通过几桩不同的婚姻描写，让读者自己去琢磨……
在这本书中，描写的人物尽管很多，但作者安排得很巧妙，显得有主有次。虽然这里面的人除了简·贝内特和伊丽沙白·贝内特以及宾利先生和达西先生外，其它的人几乎都存在很多缺点。但正因为对这些小人物的描写，更让我们觉得它的真实，因为在生活中，我们其实或多或少地也在扮演着这些并不光彩的角色，不是吗?扪心自问，无论是贝内特太太的自私、势利、放荡;威克姆的恩将仇报;柯林斯的虚伪愚蠢、奴颜婢膝还是凯瑟琳夫人的独断专行、自私自利;以及其它人的……，我们是不是都能从自己或周围人的身上找出些原型来?
当然，书中所描写的人物并不是都那么猥琐。
简是贝内特家的大小姐，她美貌而又性格温和，甚至有些天真，从来都不会把别人往坏处想——哪怕她明知别人在欺骗她!其实这样的人虽然看似完美，但我觉得，她似乎缺少应有的是非鉴别能力，倘若她生存当今的中国，只怕被人骗得连东南西北都不知道了!其实做人不仅仅要有宽容之心，还要有起码的判断能力，知道什么时候该忍，什么时候该退!
我最推崇的是伊丽沙白——贝内特家的三小姐。她美丽、热情、聪明、自尊自信、面对权势绝不低头。当她看到达西的傲慢行为时，即使知道他是一个年薪上万英磅、并且地位颇高的少爷，她也绝不因此而强迫自己去巴结他。舞会上，当整个朗波村的人都对他趋炎附势时，她只是鄙夷地坐在一边。后来，她知道自己错怪了达西时，也敢于表白歉意。还有，在简生病的时候，她放下小姐的架子，徒步冒着雨去探望姐姐，耐心地服侍姐姐……总之，在这本书中，她几乎是一个完美的可人儿，有个性，却又善良无私!
宾利是一个和简差不多的“老好人”，尽管他也很有钱，但他却那么平易近人。俗话说“物以类聚，人以群分”，他和简能走到一起，我想，这既是偶然的，也是必然的。
至于达西呢，前面说过，他是一个“傲慢的家伙”，尽管他外表很高傲，但实际上，他的内心很善良，他虽然有钱有势，但对佣人们却那么慈悲，对朋友也那么真诚、无私。其实他高傲是因为他有资本——试问一下，一个从小就生长在权贵家庭的少爷，一个一直被父母宠着的独子，能不养成自高自大的坏毛病吗?开始，他也存在着很深的门户之见，但是，在伊丽沙白的影响下，他慢慢地开始接近那些“和他身份很不相称的”小老百姓了。后来，他和伊丽沙白抛开门户之见，终于走到一起了，他们这两个性格几近完美的人，以后互相影响，也许会变得更完美了吧。
……
总之，看完这本书，感想颇多，无奈文笔有限，难免词不达意，写下些生硬的文字，但愿大家别见笑!同时，建议大家都看看这本书，看完后掩卷深思一下书的主题：爱情，到底是应该把什么放在第一位?
Pride and Prejudice ", a novel a pleasure to behold, a beautiful and moving story.
The article describes a number of daughters Bo Nate story. Ji-an eldest daughter, gentle kind-hearted, beautiful Keren, Bentley and rich kids at first sight, but at the crucial moment has brought a twist. Second daughter, Elizabeth, Qingli intelligent, ambitious, assertive, consistent with the property of the nobility million youth met Darcy. Can be as arrogant Darcy eccentric, Elizabeth for his prejudice are serious, they love but refuse to recognize the obvious, but also continue to hurt each other with words, but fortunately dispelled the last mistake, married lovers.
Reading this novel, I have benefited greatly. In our people, there are many very modest, but there are some arrogant people. These arrogant people who sometimes annoying, they have eyes in the head long, others are dismissive. Indeed, the arrogance is a shortcoming in the environment to develop a character. Chinese children from an early age by their parents as holding typical "little emperors." If so has been from small to large, how could it not arrogant? So I think that we should not be arrogant people who have prejudices, but the more soul-searching myself, to see if they have not arrogant, after their own things to learn to no longer allow parents to worry about, tired.
As the book said: "Heart of pride in everyone. As long as we have so a little bit of strength, they will feel especially great. But pride and vanity while the same meaning, but in real terms in different kinds of self-pride is a feeling, Vanity will need to involve other people overestimate their own, so people have a pride without vanity, which is justifiable.